|
|
Post by eamus catuli on Aug 5, 2008 17:43:44 GMT -5
www.avclub.com/content/music/paul_westerbergThe review is positive, but it's misleading with some factual information -- it states that all of the recent "ragged glory" is under the Grandpaboy moniker, and, more egregiously, it suggests that the classic rock medley alone is a 44-minute mp3.
|
|
|
|
Post by wecantgetanybetter on Dec 21, 2008 1:33:31 GMT -5
www.avclub.com/content/music/paul_westerbergThe review is positive, but it's misleading with some factual information -- it states that all of the recent "ragged glory" is under the Grandpaboy moniker, and, more egregiously, it suggests that the classic rock medley alone is a 44-minute mp3. The MPLS edition of the Onion put 49:00 on its ten-best list in the local pages. Those aren't available online I don't think, but it had a few nice things to say about it too. |
|
wibbler
Dances With Posts
"bleeding but we ain't cut"
Posts: 46
|
Post by wibbler on Dec 22, 2008 1:51:51 GMT -5
www.avclub.com/content/music/paul_westerbergThe review is positive, but it's misleading with some factual information -- it states that all of the recent "ragged glory" is under the Grandpaboy moniker, and, more egregiously, it suggests that the classic rock medley alone is a 44-minute mp3. While the article isn't as clearly written as it could have been, I couldn't see that "factual information". (perhaps the article was subsequently edited?) The line in the review: does not indicate that all the 'recent, ragged glory' is under Grandpa Boy, the "and with his latest release under his own name", contradicts the 'all' assertion. I couldn't see where the review states as a fact that the 'classic rock medley alone is a 44-minute mp3'. From the review: "The latter" being referred to is the "release under his own name" - as opposed to what could be referred to as the former, the Grandpa Boy work. |
|
