|
Post by cellarfullofnoise on Aug 21, 2005 6:48:17 GMT -5
From the Nov. 2003 Blues Bytes CD review website (I missed this one at the time) www.bluenight.com/BluesBytes/wn1103.html I have almost as little info to offer you about Grandpaboy’s new release, Dead Man Shake (Fat Possum), as I did about the Warren Haynes release above. What you need to know, apparently, is this: Grandpaboy is the alter ego of ex-Replacements leader Paul Westerberg, and Dead Man Shake is a drunken, echo- and fuzz-laden '50s style rockin’ blues record, with a few classic country covers thrown in. Though the whole thing is more of an afterthought, a fun project, for Westerberg, and the songs are good but not exceptional, you can’t help but like this release for one reason, and one reason only: its glorious sound. The thing sounds EXACTLY like those poorly recorded, over-amplified (given the era’s amps' quality) and distorted singles that appeared at the end of the '50s and beginning of the '60s on tiny labels on both sides of the Atlantic, which would eventually be collected and named “garage-rock” on such compilations as the Nuggets box set. Think Jimmy Reed, as emulated by drunken 19-year-old imitators with absolutely no “artistic” goal except to play the music they love for the girls they want to take to bed, and you get the idea. Of course, Westerberg is a consummate professional, and this is only a pastiche; but when pastiches are so well done, I’m buying. (www.fatpossum.com) --- Benoît Brière
|
|
|
Post by brianlux on Aug 21, 2005 16:22:55 GMT -5
Though not my favorite Westerberg album, I love it for that fact that, as the review above points out, it has that glorious "poorly recorded, over-amplified...and distorted singles" sound AND it was released on vinyl. I don't know if the taping was done analog, but it wouldn't surprise me. Is anyone else out there (besides Neil Young- Yay Neil!) as fond of analog sound as I am?
|
|
The Indoor Boy
Beagle Scout
"Such a morning must come to all the friends of Smirnoff."
Posts: 1,904
|
Post by The Indoor Boy on Aug 28, 2005 20:48:20 GMT -5
Though not my favorite Westerberg album, I love it for that fact that, as the review above points out, it has that glorious "poorly recorded, over-amplified...and distorted singles" sound AND it was released on vinyl. I don't know if the taping was done analog, but it wouldn't surprise me. Is anyone else out there (besides Neil Young- Yay Neil!) as fond of analog sound as I am? Well, I am, but given the fact that I can neither sing nor play a musical instrument to save my life you're unlikely to hear me making much use of it.
|
|
|
Post by brianlux on Aug 30, 2005 14:03:08 GMT -5
Well, I am, but given the fact that I can neither sing nor play a musical instrument to save my life you're unlikely to hear me making much use of it. [/quote] Hooray! Thank you Indoor Boy! I'm not alone! I've often thought a good motto or bumper sticker would read: "Analog love songs will save the world!"
|
|
|
Post by ABoyNamedPosh on Sept 19, 2005 9:58:42 GMT -5
Back to Mono!
I think Paul records digitally because it's so much cheaper, but goes to great lengths to fuck up the sound and make it sound analogue... He runs the signal through old valve amps and stuff...
|
|
|
Post by rbourlan on Nov 1, 2005 21:29:12 GMT -5
I've played through and owned quite a few solid state guitar amps and though I heard tube amps were supposed to be better I just couldn't justify their rediculously higher prices to myself. When I decided to get rid of my big huge solid state amp for something smaller and quieter I finally seriously sat down with a tube amp to check one out. I'm kicking myself for playing loudly with mediocre sounds at best when I could have had such a better sound at slightly lower volume. Analog, and older musical technology in general, still rules.
|
|