|
|
Post by claypigeon on Mar 2, 2004 17:47:53 GMT -5
Don't know why I'm suddenly curious about this, but I never listened to the Twin Tone remasters. Has anybody actually compared them with the original CDs? Is there any noticeable improvement in quality?
|
|
Brad
Star Scout
Posts: 364
|
Post by Brad on Mar 3, 2004 2:47:55 GMT -5
I didn't want to buy the remasters because I heard that none of the band would see any of the money from it. But I only had old copies of "Sorry Ma... "and "Let it Be" and they were scratched to shit so I bought the remasters. I have to say that they sound a lot louder is all. It is still all the same it just seems like they turned up the volume more. Keep in mind though I wouldn't know the first thing about what the f*ck is involved in a "remaster" but I can tell you if you listen to the old one and then put in the remaster -the remaster just sounds louder to me. It is also nice that it doesn't skip through Androgynous and Answering Machine anymore but that was just my old CD.
|
|
hipcheck
First Class Scout
wiggly-riffic
Posts: 103
|
Post by hipcheck on Mar 4, 2004 11:41:10 GMT -5
I always wondered the same thing myself....having the original CDs always wondered if the remasters were worth it. For the record....I just heard the SACD version of Bowie's Ziggy Stardust and its incredible.
|
|
|
|
Post by torethatbridgeout on Mar 4, 2004 14:13:56 GMT -5
Don't know why I'm suddenly curious about this, but I never listened to the Twin Tone remasters. Has anybody actually compared them with the original CDs? Is there any noticeable improvement in quality? They left on "Gimme Noise" if that's what you mean. |
|
|
|
Post by Kathy on Mar 4, 2004 14:40:04 GMT -5
They left on "Gimme Noise" if that's what you mean. ;D |
|
